Sunstein on Conspiracy Theories
Sunstein's paper on Conspiracy Theories
Is this a Trojan horse?
"We will ask whether judges do more good than harm by invoking statutes such as the Freedom of Information Act to force government to disclose facts that would rebut conspiracy theories. Our conclusions are generally skeptical: there is little reason to believe that judges can improve on administrative choices in these situations."
And then this bit of disinformation, at least as far as it lacks even a supporting footnote?
"The widespread belief that U.S. officials knowingly allowed 9/11 to happen or even brought it about may have hampered the government’s efforts to mobilize social resources and political support for measures against future terrorist attacks."
Not directly connected perhaps but, I think, relevant given his mode of reference is that I find references to 'government' to be implausible on the face of it. Large governments in particular are made up of people and are inherently factionalized.
--- a point he does mention later in section C though I regard his explacation as self serving and he mentions not at all the role of courts in simply getting a government agency to justify its stance, that is, the court provides an external review that is unlikely to be influenced by internal informational cascades.
2. Which audience?
... "Under pluralistic ignorance, the perverse result may actually be to spread the conspiracy theory further."
Most of the section seemed reasonable to me but then it descended into functional incoherence.
On the whole, it seems to me, that Sunstein pays too much deference to the good judgement of bureaucrats, a la Hayek i am disposed to think that more input into decisions is better than less.
Also, the paper would have benifited from a style editor.
